Students experience innovation both in content and approach. This is reflected and encouraged through:
During a workshop run by Inventium with leaders at Flinders, innovation was defined as “change that adds value”. So, to be innovative as curriculum is developed, it is essential to ensure the changes we make “add value”. In her exploration of pedagogical innovation, Boden (2019) discovered many academic staff think of innovation as a cycle involving risk taking and reflection on the part of both teacher and learner. The cycle relies on staff eliciting student support and feedback as they innovate the curriculum and their teaching practice while paying close attention to continual improvements which in turn reflect innovations. As the curriculum is continually developed and improved, changes that add value incorporate opportunities for both staff and students to take risks and reflect on their learning.
Risk taking is an important part of learning (Koh, Yeo & Hung 2015; Clifford 1991). Drawing on Vygotsky and others Clifford (1991) argues, students need to undertake learning tasks beyond their current level so cognitive skill development can occur. Staff and students therefore need to reflect on what current levels of learning and knowledge are (and should be) so they can undertake higher level tasks and determine where learning has occurred. In addition, Clifford (1991, p 271) indicates supports to aid learning such as, “instruction, practice, examples, prompt corrective feedback, and cues signalling the expected level of performance” need to be provided. The need for these supports is highlighted by Koh et al.’s (2015, p 96) point “risk taking can be threatening.” Ensuring both staff and students are supported and feel safe and affirmed when taking risks will help students to learn and teachers to develop innovative approaches to curriculum and teaching practice. Examples of this include:
Boden (2019, p 850) suggests several pedagogical practices are used when teaching innovatively. These include, but are not limited to, “active learning, experimentation, collaboration, technology application, and authentic assessment”. In addition, Isabirye & Moloi (2013, p 106) argue “innovative teachers have the ability and skills to create a positive learning environment that supports student learning, as an environment in which the organisation of learning space reflects creativity on the part of the teacher and enables the students to be productive, active agents in individual and cooperative learning encounters.” Some examples are:
Boden (2019) describes innovative teaching as “reciprocal engagement”, where teaching staff “build on their pedagogical strategies and practices continuously throughout their academic career and engage students both academically and socially to increase effectiveness in their teaching” (p 851). She presents innovation as cyclical where teaching staff and students “intentionally and continuously” assess and evaluate student knowledge, understanding and learning. Further opportunities to innovate may then occur as new ideas are identified, adopted, modified and adapted (p 852). The process of innovation therefore requires vigilant, continuous monitoring of student learning and progress so that teaching processes are adapted, changed and improved as required. For example:
Boden, K. E. (2019). Pedagogical Innovation among University Faculty. Creative Education, 10(05), 848-861. doi:10.4236/ce.2019.105063
Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk Taking: Theoretical, Empirical, and Educational Considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 263-297. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653135
Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17(1), 4-5. doi:10.11120/plan.2006.00170004
Figueira, C., Theodorakopoulos, N., & Caselli, G. (2018). Unveiling faculty conceptions of academic risk taking: a phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1307-1320. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1250074
Isabirye, A. K., & Moloi, K. C. (2013). Professional development and its implications for innovative teaching and learning in one South African higher education institution. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 101-108. doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n14p101
Koh, E., Yeo, J., & Hung, D. (2015). Pushing boundaries, taking risks. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(2), 95-99. doi:10.1080/23735082.2015.1081318
Potinkara, H., Römer-Paakkanen, T., Suonpää, M., & Kiviniemi, S. (2013). Developing passion and risk taking-pedagogy. Interdisciplinary Studies Journal, 3(3), 7-18.