
  • flinders.edu.au
  • Staff
  • Students
  • Library
Flinders University Logo Flinders University Logo
  • Employee resources

    Benefits and pay

    • Benefits and pay overview
    • Getting paid
    • Leave
    • Superannuation
    • Employee health plan
    • Employee assistance program
    • Staff discounts and offers
    • P&C forms, documents and guides

    Working at Flinders

    • Working at Flinders overview
    • Information for new staff
    • All job vacancies
    • Internal job vacancies
    • Enterprise agreement
    • Equal opportunity and diversity
    • Performance reviews

    Professional Development

    • Professional development overview
    • Academic promotion

    Manager & supervisor resources

    • Manager & Supervisor resources overview
    • Supervisor reference manual
    • Induction checklist
    • Inducting new staff
    Workday
    Flinders Pro
    iEnrol login
  • Workplace support

    Doing your job

    • Digital services
    • Travel
    • Work health and safety
    • Finance
    • Finance forms, documents and guides
    • Handling student complaints
    • Policy library
    • Risk management

    Everyday needs

    • Searchable list of everyday topics
    • Room bookings
    • Flinders Press (Printing and copying)
    • Corporate Word and Powerpoint templates
    • Guide to updating your staff profile

    Your campus

    • Parking on campus (Bedford Park)
    • Parking and transport (Tonsley)
    • Building work - current projects and campus works
    • Virtual Business Blue and Guest parking permits

    Contractors

    • Contractor registration and inductions
    Service One
    Okta
    vPermit
    FlinSafe
  • Teaching and research resources

    Teaching resources

    • Learning and teaching
    • Timetables
    • Academic integrity

    Research resources

    • Research support
    • Research contracts
    • Research integrity, ethics and compliance
    • Researcher training, development and communications
    • Research analytics and reporting
    • Research partnerships and commercialisation

    Funding opportunities

    • Funding opportunities overview
    • Philanthropic funding
    • Research grants and tenders
    • Teaching and learning awards
    Student Two Web
    Research Now login
  • Colleges and services

    Colleges

    • College of Business, Government and Law
    • College of Education, Psychology and Social Work
    • College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
    • College of Medicine and Public Health
    • College of Nursing and Health Sciences
    • College of Science and Engineering

    Professional Services

    • Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching
    • Finance and Procurement Services
    • Flinders International Services
    • Governance, Legal and Risk
    • Information and Digital Services
    • Office of Communication, Marketing and Engagement
    • Office of Graduate Research
    • Office of Indigenous Strategy and Engagement
    • People and Culture
    • Property, Facilities and Development
    • Research Development and Support
    • Student Administration Services
    • Student Experience
    • Student Recruitment
    Service One
    Staff directory
  • flinders.edu.au
  • Staff
  • Students
  • Library
  • You have no saved courses.

    Continue to explore your course options.

     
    Explore our courses

    Your saved courses

    {{{courseName}}}
    mail_outline
    delete
    View all saved courses
  • Quick links 
    • Staff directory
    • Workday
    • Service One
    • Flinders dashboard (Okta)
    • Calendar
    • Semester dates
    • Bedford Park campus map
    • Parking
    • Policy library

 

Internal course accreditation

Learning and teaching Internal course accreditation

Flinders University is a registered higher education provider under the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 and is authorised to self-accredit all course offerings that lead to a higher education qualification.

It is a requirement of this registration that all accredited courses are comprehensively reviewed at least every seven years to ensure continued compliance with the Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015. 

The Internal Course Accreditation process is the mechanism implemented by the University to support this requirement and replaces the Five Yearly Course Review process.

Quick links

     Educational quality context  Your guide to internal accreditation  Schedule  FAQs  Educational Quality Framework  Award Courses Policy  Award Course Improvement and Accreditation Procedures

Educational quality context

Internal course accreditation sits firmly within the Education Quality Framework and supports the two key pillars that underpin educational quality in the university:

  • Educational quality assurance – uses robust frameworks, models, policies and processes to ensure educational offerings comply with all legislative and regulatory requirements, and reflect excellent practice in core academic structure.

  • Educational quality improvement – uses a strong central framework and processes to support cycles of continuous improvement, recognising that educational quality is not an end goal, but an ongoing pursuit.

Whilst internal course accreditation is a mechanism for ensuring legislative compliance, it sits firmly in the continuous course improvement and accreditation cycle and is part of a broader educational quality process. 

award-course-improvement-accreditation-cycle.png

Your guide to internal accreditation

Governance

Internal course accreditation is governed by the Award Courses Policy and supported by the Award Course Improvement and Accreditation Procedures.

As specified in the procedures, the internal course accreditation submission will:

  1. align the data and information with the applicable standards of the higher education standards framework relevant to course accreditation, and
  2. include a set of recommendations to support the ongoing improvement of the course curriculum and delivery, and
  3. include a plan and timeframes for the development and implementation of the recommendations that must not extend beyond one year from the date of the finalised submission, unless an extension of time has been granted by the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Students).

 

Responsibility

While the educational quality team initiates the review process each year, and supports each review submission through the university’s academic governance, internal course accreditation takes place with  oversight of the Education Quality Committee and is led by the relevant teaching program director or their nominee (academic lead).  The academic lead will be supported by the assigned Educational Quality Team officer who will source and collate a package of course information and complete the non-academic sections of the submission template.  

 

Submission

The procedures specify content that must be included in the submission and the format of the submission must align the content to the applicable standards of the higher education standards framework.  To achieve this, the submission consists of two parts:

1

Package of course information

The package includes all submission content specified in Section 4.2 of the Procedures  and consists of a PDF document and various other files.  It is developed by the Educational Quality Team and provided to the academic lead at the beginning of the process.  Further items are developed by the academic lead (and other contributors) and are included as they become available.  The package is saved as a OneDrive folder and a link is provided in the submission template.

2

Submission template

The template is in table format and facilitates the alignment of course information, data and recommendations to the applicable HESF standards.  This ensures courses are rigorously assessed against relevant criteria and recommendations are supported by a strong, focussed evidence base. It also ensures a consistent, focussed approach is applied to internal course accreditations across the University.  A partially completed submission template (i.e. non-academic contributions to the submission) is provided to the academic lead at the beginning of the process and its completion is a collaborative process between the academic lead, educational quality team and other contributors.  Guidance notes for users are included in the template as well as an implementation plan.

Submission template example and guidance notes

Package Contents

Required content as per procedure

Responsibility

a)   Summary of the improvements recommended as a result of the last reaccreditation submission, and details of how these have been developed and implemented

Academic lead to provide report.

Initially, this will be based on the 5 yearly course review report and implementation plan. 

b)   Observations and improvements made as a result of the continuous monitoring approach detailed in Section 3, including:

  1. quality indicator data (KAMs and OPMs) captured, monitored and acted upon since the last submission
  2. outcomes based on recommendations made by course quality advisory groups (as defined in Section 3.2.of the Course Improvement and Accreditation Procedures) since the last submission
  3. outcomes based on recommendations made by industry advisory boards since the last submission
  4. outcomes of any academic calibration activities undertaken since the last submission
  5. improvement-focused changes to the teaching or other delivery aspects made since the last submission, and
  6. any additional data requested from the University’s Planning Services Unit.

Academic lead to provide summary report(s)  for these items.

EQT will provide the following data to support the development of these reports:

  • list of calibrated topics and reports
  • summary of course and topic changes made to course(s) during the current accreditation period
  • course statistics package from Planning and Analytical Services

 

c)    The current course rule, including current program of study and learning outcomes for each course

EQT to provide list of course rule web page hyperlinks (including hyperlinked topics in course rules)

Include links to any English language requirements as these are published on separate pages.

d)   An outline of all topics included in the course and a summary report of current topic assessment methods

EQT to provide list of topic details pages hyperlinks and SAMs summary report from FLEX

e)   A current financial viability model for the course or courses

Academic lead to obtain from college business partner.

f)     A current market viability statement (domestic and international)

EQT to request statement from:

  • Director, Student Recruitment
  • Manager, International Recruitment and Engagement (College level)

g)    Details of any third-party agreements and credit arrangements

EQT to obtain from contracts officers, WIL team, content manager, Student Management System etc.

Provide summary report of currency, accuracy, anomalies etc.

h)   A submission from the course coordinator/s

Academic lead

i)     A summary of Quality Indicators for Learning and Teaching (QILT) available since the last submission

EQT obtain from QILT website and format into clear report using agreed FOE usage and template/ format

j)     Relevant professional accreditation information, if applicable

EQT

Additional content to be included

Responsibility

a)   Document that highlights any policy non-compliance, anomalies or inconsistencies (use links as necessary): 

  1. University course information pages
  2. University international portal pages
  3. English language pages of international partner universities that market the cours
  4. SATAC website
  5. Third party webpages that market the course
  6. Course “handbooks” (or similar) on web

EQT

 

b)      AHEGS for all courses

AHEGS report generated from Student Management System with any obvious out of date AHEGS or missing AHEGS highlighted.

Academic lead to review all AHEGS to ensure currency and relevance.

c)      Curriculum structure summary report

EQT reviews curriculum structures of all courses and reports on compliance against Awards Courses policy.  Drafts advice.

 

Approval

The completed submission template (including recommendations and link to the package) is submitted first to the relevant Dean (Education) for endorsement on the advice of the College Education Committee and is then submitted to the Educational Quality Committee for review.  Based on their advice, the DVC(S) determines whether to reaccredit the course/s for a maximum of seven years (or shorter period) or to discontinue the course/s.

 

Implementation

The Educational Quality Team works with the college to develop and facilitate approval for any course or topic amendments identified in the submission.  The Educational Quality Team reports on the implementation of the recommendations twelve months after the reaccreditation of the course.  This report is submitted to the DVC(S).   

internal-accreditation-process.png

Schedule

Schedule
College UG/PG Review group Review year
BGL PG Aged Care Admin / Health Admin 2021
BGL PG Business – Postgraduate 2023
BGL UG Business - Undergraduate 2023
BGL Both Commerce / Accounting 2019
BGL UG Criminology / Law and Society 2020
BGL Both Innovation and Enterprise 2022
BGL Both International Relations 2019
BGL Both Law – all & combined degrees with Commerce/ Accounting 2023
BGL PG Public Administration - Postgraduate 2021
BGL UG Public Administration undergraduate 2023
EPSW Both Education - Postgraduate, GE & Organisational Learning 2020
EPSW UG Education - undergraduate double degrees  2022
EPSW PG Loss, Grief & Trauma Counselling 2020
EPSW Both Psychology / Behavioural Science 2022
EPSW PG Social Work - Postgraduate 2021
EPSW UG Social Work - Undergraduate 2021
EPSW UG Special Education (Singapore) 2022
EPSW Both Sport, Health and Physical Activity 2020
EPSW UG Teaching - Postgraduate 2022
HASS Both Archaeology 2020
HASS Both Arts / General Studies / English 2023
HASS Both Creative Arts / Communication & Professional Writing / Screen Media Arts & Digital Production for Entertainment 2020
HASS PG Gender and Development / Women’s Studies 2020
HASS PG Gender Mainstreaming / International Development 2022
HASS Both Language / Teaching English as a Second Language  2020
HASS Both Theology 2020
HASS Both Tourism 2023
MPH PG Biotechnology 2020
MPH PG Chronic Condition Management 2019
MPH PG Clinical Education 2020
MPH UG Clinical Sciences 2022
MPH PG Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 2020
MPH PG Doctor of Medicine 2021
MPH PG Health and International Development 2021
MPH UG Medical Science 2019
MPH UG Medical Science (Vision Science) 2019
MPH Both Paramedic Science  2019
MPH PG Public Health - Postgraduate 2020
MPH PG Remote Health 2019
NHS PG Applied Gerontology 2023
NHS PG Audiology 2020
NHS PG Clinical Rehabilitation 2021
NHS Both Disability and Developmental Education 2020
NHS PG Disaster Health Care 2022
NHS Both Exercise Science / Exercise Physiology 2022
NHS UG Health Sciences 2019
NHS Both Healthy Ageing 2023
NHS PG Midwifery - Postgraduate 2023
NHS UG Midwifery - Undergraduate 2023
NHS PG Nurse Practitioner 2020
NHS UG Nursing – Undergraduate 2021
NHS PG Nursing Postgraduate 2023
NHS Both Nutrition and Dietetics 2019
NHS Both Occupational Therapy 2022
NHS PG Palliative Care 2020
NHS PG Palliative Care in Aged Care 2023
NHS Both Physiotherapy 2022
NHS Both Speech Pathology 2023
NHS PG Vision Science / Optometry 2022
OGR PG Research Methods 2022
S&E PG Aquaculture - Postgraduate 2021
S&E Both Computer Science Information Technology 2023
S&E UG Design and Technology Innovation 2021
S&E Both Engineering 2023
S&E Both Environmental Health 2020
S&E, HASS Both Environmental Management 2023
S&E Both Geographical Information systems 2022
S&E PG Groundwater Hydrology / Water Resources Management 2022
S&E Both Mathematical Sciences 2022
S&E Both Science 2019

Frequently asked questions

How is this process different to five yearly course reviews?

Internal course accreditation signifies a shift away from standalone review events held every five years to an ongoing process that forms part of the continuous course improvement and accreditation cycle.  It sits firmly within the Educational Quality Framework and is underpinned by the Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF).  The previous terms of reference have been replaced by applicable HESF standards.    

Do we still need to appoint an external chair and panel?

No. The university recognises that academic staff who manage, coordinate and teach into the courses are best placed to report on curriculum, outcomes, achievements and areas for improvement.  The external review panel model does not align with the continuous improvement cycle and is no longer a requirement. 

What kind of documentation is involved?

See Submission section above.

Who writes the submission if there is no chair?

The process is driven by an academic lead who is either the relevant teaching program director or their nominee. The academic lead may appoint  “Other contributors” and together they complete various academic sections of the submission template, provide specified course information and write recommendations.

The academic lead is supported by a dedicated educational quality officer who collates and prepares specified course information, completes non-academic sections of the template and manages the development, submission and approval process.

Who interviews stakeholders if there is no panel meeting or site visits?

We do not need to interview stakeholders.  More regular stakeholder contributions will be supported by the inclusion of industry, external and student representation on Course Quality Advisory groups, as outlined in the Award Course Improvement and Accreditation Procedures.  These contributions, combined with information collected via other college consultation mechanisms (such as advisory boards and academic calibration activities), will contribute to the internal course accreditation process.

  • Educational Quality Framework
  • Award Courses Policy
  • Award Course Improvement and Accreditation Procedures
Do we need formal internal course accreditation meetings? Is that part of the process?

There is no formal requirement for meetings.  The academic lead is responsible for deciding who needs to meet and how often.  There may be several meetings or no meetings at all if other collaborative tools are deemed to be more useful.  

Who determines the schedule of internal course accreditation submissions? When is my course up for re-accreditation?

The Master Schedule was approved by the DVC(S) in March 2019 and is based on the year the last course review was undertaken or the first year of course accreditation (if course not yet reviewed).  Each year, it is reviewed by the Associate Director, Educational Quality (with input from the Deans -Education) and any recommended amendments are submitted to the DVC(S) for approval. See the Schedule.

What happens when the documentation is submitted to EQC?

The completed submission template and package is submitted to the Dean (Education) for endorsement on the advice of their College Education Committee, and then to the Education Quality Committee for review.  Based on the advice of the Education Quality Committee, the DVC(S) determines whether to reaccredit the course/s for a maximum of seven years (or shorter period) or to discontinue the course/s.

What happens after the course is re-accredited?

The Educational Quality Team works with the college to develop and facilitate the approval of any course or topic amendments identified in the submission.  The Educational Quality Team reports on the implementation of the recommendations twelve months after the reaccreditation of the course.  This is submitted to the DVC(S).   

Do we need to negotiate an implementation plan after the submission is approved?

No.  The Implementation Plan is included in the submission template - it is not a separate document or process

How do I obtain copies or reports/submissions from previous reviews/accreditation?

Email educational.quality@flinders.edu.au

Who do I contact for assistance with professional accreditation?

Please see professional accreditation for further information.   

Need help?

Contact the Educational Quality Team if you have questions or need assistance.

educational.quality@flinders.edu.au

Flinders University Logo

Sturt Rd, Bedford Park
South Australia 5042

  • Glossary of terms and abbreviations
  • Current students
  • Staff directory
  • Flinders website

Follow Flinders

Facebook - Flinders University Twitter - Flinders University YouTube - Flinders University Instagram - Flinders University LinkedIn - Flinders University

Feedback and requests

Disclaimer

Accessibility

Privacy

CRICOS Provider: 00114A

Last Updated: 10 Dec 2019
Inspiring achievemnt logo

This website uses cookies

Flinders University uses cookies to ensure website functionality, personalisation, and for a variety of purposes described in the website privacy statement. For details about these cookies and how to set your cookie preferences, refer to our website privacy statement.

You consent to the use of our cookies if you proceed.

Accept and continue